Policy Portfolio Redux Exhibits

[Investment Committee Behavior]

Source: 2003 4Q Commentary

(These are the exhibits referenced from the article Policy Portfolio Redux. Please use your browser's back button to return to the main article.)

Exhibit 1 — Impact of 12/31/2002 Policy Changes

Pre
12/31/02
Post-
12/31/02
∆ in
Weight
2003
Benchmark
Return
US Stocks 25% 23% -2% 31.6%
Foreign Stocks 25% 23% -2% 40.8%
Absolute Return 20% 20% 6.2%
High Yield Bonds 3% +3% 28.0%
REITs 3% +3% 36.7%
Resource-Related Stocks 5% 7% +2% 38.9%
Conventional Bonds 10% 8% -2% 1.3%
Inflation-Linked Bonds 15% 13% -2% 7.3%
Total 100% 100% NA

Exhibit 2 – 6/30/2003 Policy Changes

Pre
6/30/03
Post-
6/30/03
∆ in
Weight
US Stocks 23% -23%
Foreign Stocks 23% -23%
Global Stocks 46% +46%
Absolute Return 20% 20%
High Yield Bonds 3% 3%
REITs 3% 3%
Resource-Related Stocks 7% 7%
Conventional Bonds 8% 8%
Inflation-Linked Bonds 13% 13%
Total 100% 100% NA

Exhibit 3 — Illustrative Policy Portfolio

Expected Gross Returns Allocation
Real Return Value Added [a] Real Total Return Current Proposed Benchmark
Segment / Eligible Assets
Total Return Assets 69% 71%
Marketable Equities 3.5% 1.5% 5.0% 46% 33% MSCI All Country World Free
Private Equity 10.0% subsumed 10.0% 0% 15% MSCI All Country World Free + 5% per annum
Absolute Return 6.0% subsumed 6.0% 20% 20% Treasury Bill + 5% per annum
High Yield Bonds 3.0% 2.0% 5.0% 3% 3% Merril Lynch US High Yield Master II Constrained
Inflation Hedges 10% 12%
Resource-Related Assets [b] 6.0% subsumed 6.0% 7% 5% Global Index of Resource-Related Stocks
Marketable Real Estate (REITs) 3.0% 3.0% 6.0% 3% 0% Morgan Stanley REIT Index
Private Real Estate 6.0% subsumed 6.0% 0% 7% CPI + 5% per annum
Deflation Hedges 8% 8%
Conventional Treasuries 1.0% 0.0% 1.0% 8% 8% 10-year Treasury Bond
All Purpose Hedges 13% 9%
Inflation-Linked Treasuries 2.3% 0.0% 2.3% 13% 9% 10-year Treasury Inflation-Protected Security
Cash Equivalents 1.0% 0.0% 1.0% 0% 0%
Totals
Percent Allocated 100% 100% Weighted average of segment benchmarks
Expected Real Total Return 4.6% 5.5%
Estimated Probability of Producing Less than 5% Real Return [d]
• Over 3 years >50% >75%
• Over 30 Years >60% >35%
[a] Expected value added from the use of assets or strategies that could cause a sub-segment's returns to deviate from the returns of its parent segment's benchmark.
[b] Public and private.
[c] Minimum and normal cash positions could be negative, subject to trustee discussion of appropriate leverage ratios. Endowed charities can lever their portfolios without incurring unrelated business taxable income - if they're clever about it. Of course, if leverage is permitted, non-cash ranges must be tweaked accordingly.
[d] Shortfall probabilities are expressed imprecisely to underscore the inherent limitations of computerized approaches to policy formulation. These limitations are catalogued in the TIFF Commentary for 1Q 1999. Proposed mix has higher probability of shortfall over three years due to private investments' tendency to perform poorly during the initial years following their acquisition.

Exhibit 4 - Illustrative Policy Ranges

Minimum Normal Maximum
Total Return Assets 71%
Marketable Equities 25% 33% 60%
Private Equity 0% 15% 35%
Absolute Return 10% 20% 35%
High Yield Bonds 0% 3% 10%
Inflation Hedges 12%
Resource-Related Assets 3% 5% 10%
Marketable Real Estate (REITs) 0% 0% 10%
Private Real Estate 3% 7% 15%
Deflation Hedges 8%
Conventional Treasuries 8% 8% 20%
All Purpose Hedges 9%
Inflation-Linked Treasuries 9% 9% 20%
Cash Equivalents 0% 0% 10%
Total 100%